This can only end badly. I know it with the certainty of one who has read too much fiction, seen to many movies, been terminally infected by that disease of the narrative world, suspense.
The first time i crossed the homeless man’s path it was a month ago. I was leaving work, rushing to the subway, and he was very, very slowly shuffling up 42nd street. As i waited at the corner to cross to the Bryant Park side, I turned to look at him. He was at least fifty-five, stooped, toothless and was entirely shrouded in newspapers held on with bits of string.
I know you’re supposed to be inured to the human desolation you witness on a daily basis in this city, but the lesson hasn’t quite sunk in yet. This man, I was suddenly certain, had about three days to live, and I couldn’t just walk away because… well, because there is a point up to which you can resist doing what’s right, you know that saving the world is a bottomless well you can only drown in, and then some set of preconceived ideas dictate that this situation is beyond the ordinary despair you can cope with if not ignore entirely, and you what? Take him home with you? (cf. Nick Hornby’s How to be good, which attempts to, if not offer any practical/feasible answers to this question, at least lay bare the inadequacy of our total inaction and guilt-trip us into oblivion). You know you’re supposed to take him home. It’s obvious, simply because you have a place to live that could easily shelter six people if push came to shove, and leftovers from Saturday night that go uneaten on Sunday, and a human being is a human being and not a social issue or a conscience problem. But we’re rabbits in the headlights, paralyzed by the enormity of the situation and the contradictory nature of our inculcated desperate race for comfort and security, be it real or imagined. And you know all this already, and i’m getting sidetracked.
So I wasn’t going to take him home with me. And I didn’t want to give him cash, because you want to make sure that it’ll be put to good use, and not good booze. I despise myself for thinking that way, because I’ve always been of the opinion that I’m in no position to judge what my fellow man wishes to do with his money. The day I ask someone for some change, I’d like them not to question my motives or intentions. And I try to act accordingy when asked for a handout. But in this case, I was so sure the guy was a) dying, and b) would simply not make it to a store to buy food, or c) would not make it into the store because this is midtown Manhattan and you just can’t have newspaper-shrouded people wandering the aisles of your BCBG deli, dahling. So I decided to buy him a meal.
Stupidly, in my confused state of good intentions and simultaneous discomfort at wanting to help some random homeless person in full view of two thousand other members of the rat race that could only resent my showoff-ish display of goody-goodness, I went straight to buy him a sandwich and a bottle of water instead of first asking him if I could buy him someting to eat. Because you want to make this type of act as hit-and-run as possible. If you speak to the person, then you’ll have to take them home with you, right? They’ll no longer just be another homeless person, they’ll be Harry or Mark or John, and once you know that, you’re not leaving them sitting on the subway stairs. I realize now that this means buying the guy a sandwich is just another form of payoff to my conscience, to get it to look the other way, but hey, whatever i takes so you can live with yourself.
So I run into Pret-a-Manger, grab a tuna and cucumber baguette (after losing thirty seconds debating whether or not a homeless person’s diminished digestive system could deal with the more enticing tuna wasabe-and-ginger club; in restrospect I confess to being some kind of dumb shit) and a bottle of water and head back to the corner of 42nd and Fifth. And of course he’s gone, out of sight.
I spent the next twenty minutes circling Bryant Park and the neighbouring blocks looking for him, kicking myself for not simply telling him where I was going so he could wait for me. I swear he just dematerialized. A vision, a spook, the ghost of Novembers past. By this time it was full dark and bitter cold and I resolved to give my little paper bag to the first person I met asking for food or money. Because after all, the person I was looking for hadn’t asked for anything. Why pick him when there are at least four people between where I’m standing and the subway entrance with their hand out or a sign that reads HUNGRY. Kundera defines kitsch as that which sets a common tear in the eye of humanity. And I’d clearly succumbed to our predefined notion of pathos, our ingrained emotional triggers that say “sadness is the old helpless man with newspapers tied to his arms and legs, not the twenty-something guy with the pierced nose and army boots with the HUNGRY sign”. But in truth, what the fuck do I know, who am I to judge?
So I handed the kid the bag and went home.
Weeks passed, rain turned to snow, December rolled into town, and lo-and-behold, as I was leaving the subway station at Bryant Park at six a.m this dark and freezing Monday morning, there he was, newspapers and all, slowly shuffling from the corner to the steps leading to the library. I immediately decided to make good on my previous intentions, though this time it would be some form of breakfast, and this time I’d let him know first. But I was literally sprinting across the street as I thought this, because I was already fifteen minutes late to work and, as he’d just settled down on the steps, I could run up, punch in, and come back down again.
There’s certainly a theory out there that stupidity comes in threes. Or that we never learn. Or that not listening to your instinct is generally something you regret. And so, naturally, by the time I got back downstairs, he was gone, evaporated again. No sign of him in any direction, though at that time of morning I had a clear line of sight up and down both 42nd and Fifth.
That’s when anxiety started to set in. I kept having concurrent flashes from two very different movies. The first was the Lynchian “Hobo behind the diner” sequence from Mulholland Drive. This guy keeps having visions of a homeless man living next to the dumpster behind the diner where he’s having breakfast with his shrink, discussing said visions. And then they walk back, to dispell the guy’s fears, and though no one is there, the guy has the vision anyway and dies of a heart attack. Sort of a “hobo as portent of death and impending doom” thing. The other scene I kept returning to was from Groundhog Day. Though Bill Murray keeps trying to save an old homeless man, over and over and over again, he always ultimately fails and the old man dies.
And I know things come in threes, and I know that somehow I will cross my homeless man’s path again, and he will be dead, and it will be my fault.